The Dimming Forebear

Gaia. Rooting out
planetary impostures.
K’s false positives.

The Kepler Space Telescope was designed to discover earth-sized planets orbiting around other stars within our region of the Milky Way. Named after German astronomer and mathematician, Johannes Kepler, it was launched in 2009 and retired on the 15th November 2018, the 388th anniversary of the death of its namesake in 1630.

During its lifetime the Kepler Space Telescope discovered 2,662 planets, something it achieved by observing 530,506 stars and looking for drops in their intensity that could indicate a planet passing in front of them. Among these planets were some that were the correct distance from their star and had the right size and atmospheric pressure to support liquid water at the planet’s surface. Other planets discovered orbited two stars instead of one, and ‘hot Jupiters’ – gas giants similar to Jupiter but orbiting in close proximity to their star.

Yet telescopes continue to advance technologically. The Kepler Space Telescope used a photometer to observe the stars in its field of view. The Gaia Space Observatory, launched in 2013, uses a photometer along with an astrometry instrument and a radial-vector spectrometer.

Now research by Niraula et al. (2022) suggests that three or even four of the planets identified by the Kepler Space Telescope aren’t planets at all but are in fact stars. The team was reviewing the planetary data produced by the Kepler Space Telescope and realised that with updated measurements from the Gaia Space Observatory the ‘planets’ Kepler-854b, Kepler-840b, and Kepler-699b were far too large to be planets – each of them two to four times the size of Jupiter. The fourth ‘planet’, Kepler-747b, is 1.8 times the size of Jupiter, at the very top end of observed planets, but its far distance from its star suggests that its more likely to be a star itself than a planet.

Four out of over two and a half thousand discovered planets isn’t a large amount and certainly doesn’t take anything away from the incredible job that the Kepler Space Telescope did during its lifetime. Yet the new findings are hugely important for our knowledge and understanding of planets – by correcting this error the planet dataset is more accurate for those who are studying the population of planets as a whole.

Original research: http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac4f64

Owls of the Eastern Ice by Jonathan Slaght – Book Review

a fish owl
on an icy river bank
grabs more than fish

by Jon Hare.

Jonathan Slaght’s book “Owls of the Eastern Ice” is part natural history and part adventure story. The natural history focuses on Blakiston’s fish owl, the largest living species of owl. The adventure focuses on Dr. Slaght’s research on the Blakiston’s fish owl in the Primorye territory of Russia – a rugged region in the Far East bordering the Sea of Japan, North Korea, and China. The region is home to Amur tigers, Asiatic bears, masu salmon, and Blakiston’s fish owls. The region is also home to villages, logging companies, and loners – all living off of the land.

Dr. Slaght’s task is to understand the owl and then develop a conservation plan that the logging companies and local communities can support. This is a well written narrative that is as much a story of the human condition as it is a description of the work necessary to better understand and conserve the fish owl.

Slaght, J.C. 2020. Owls of the Eastern ice: A quest to find and save the world’s largest owl. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 368 pp. ISBN: 9781250798718

Dr. Jon Hare is a scientist who works in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. His research background is fisheries oceanography and climate change impacts on marine fisheries. Check out Jon’s previous sciku ‘Varves’, ‘Cobwebs to Foodwebs’, ‘Signs of Spring’ and ‘Glacier Mice‘.

Saba, the morning breeze by Dr Jolene Ramsey

We know you were small
Preying on Proteus too
Surprise, DNA!

by Dr Jolene Ramsey

Bacteriophages, or phages, are the viruses that infect bacteria. They come in different shapes and sizes, but are often icosahedral (spherical) and tailed. A tailed phage is structured like a filled lollipop, where the candy represents the phage head, the filling represents the nucleic acid genome, and the stick is like the tail. The overwhelming majority of phages scientists and students have discovered up to this point are tailed with a DNA genome, largely due to bias in our sampling methods. Recent investigations suggest many phages with RNA genomes remain to be isolated, and they were hypothesized to be small and round, similar to the ones that are already known. We want to find them.

In a very focused hunt, we looked for small RNA phages against the human opportunistic pathogen Proteus using a filtration selection method. After a few rounds of selection, there was a prime candidate that was definitely small, but it didn’t pass the other tests that define RNA phages. It was a puzzle. For clues, we looked at the phage shape in the electron microscope. To our astonishment the phage had a tail and a very small head! We immediately verified that it had a DNA genome as well. Though the search was a failure, we put phage Saba in the arsenal for use in other projects. To fully survey the diverse kinds of phage in the environment we will need to develop and refine targeted and general protocols for phage isolation. This will give us the most accurate picture of the phage universe.

Original research: https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.01094-19

Jolene Ramsey studies bacterial viruses (phage) as a Center for Phage Technology postdoctoral researcher. She tries to understand how phages orchestrate their escape plan at the molecular level. You can catch up with her on Twitter: @jrrmicro

Enjoyed Jolene’s sciku? Check out her excellent sciku ‘Privateer, the phage’, ‘TF gets in on the bud’, ‘Click click go!’ and ‘The Phriendly Phage‘.

The Phriendly Phage by Dr Jolene Ramsey

Phage are phriends, not phood
Not Phriendly to host, but nice
Plaques phor lab hunters

By Jolene Ramsey

Vibrio natriegens is an environmental microbe that naturally resides in marine habitats, including brackish waters and salty marshes. If you Google this bacterial species, all the top hits will tout its ‘fast’ growth. Unusual among bacteria, but common with other vibrios, V. natriegens has a  >5 Megabase genome split across two chromosomes. It also has a high count of total ribosomes, the cellular machines that make protein. As a non-pathogenic environmental organism, researchers are exploring its use in various biotechnology applications, including as a protein production system. This is one reason some are hoping V. natriegens will become the next lab workhorse in molecular and industrial microbiology that could even rival E. coli.

With an interest in improving the resources available to use in this field of research, we decided to look for bacteriophages that target V. natriegens. Bacteriophages, or phage, are the viruses that infect bacteria. Because phage rely so heavily on their host cell to copy themselves, they turn out to be extremely useful tools for probing how the cell works. As a kind of natural predator, phages can be found everywhere the host lives. The phage this Sciku is about, named Phriendly, was found in a sample collected by a college student brand-new to research on a trip to the beach.

The phage hunt process involves layering spots of environmental samples on top of growing bacteria, then looking for clear spots where the bacteria did not grow (or died due to infection) called plaques. A few of the beach samples yielded these plaques. One was a hazy, weak plaque that was difficult to propagate. We nicknamed it ‘problem phage’. In contrast, another had large, clear plaques that appeared quickly and consistently. We dubbed it the ‘friendly phage’. Following our cute tradition, we replace all ‘f’ sounds with the ‘ph’ used in the word phage to come up with the name Phriendly. Along with others, Phriendly is in a collection of phages we hope can be tools to better harvest the great potential its host microbe has for advancing biotechnology.

Original research: https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.01096-19

Jolene Ramsey studies bacterial viruses (phage) as a Center for Phage Technology postdoctoral researcher. She tries to understand how phages orchestrate their escape plan at the molecular level. You can catch up with her on Twitter: @jrrmicro

Enjoyed Jolene’s sciku? Check out her excellent sciku ‘Privateer, the phage’, ‘TF gets in on the bud’, ‘Click click go!’ and ‘Saba, the morning breeze’.

Diving for Science by Dr. Phil Colarusso

Collecting data
Breathing air underwater
They pay me for this!

By Phil Colarusso

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses scuba diving as one of many tools to study and monitor aquatic systems.  EPA currently supports 65 divers spread throughout the United States. 

Divers are involved in a wide range of scientific pursuits, including studying, monitoring and restoring valuable aquatic habitats (coral reefs, seagrass meadows, shellfish beds), tracking invasive species, collecting sediment and water samples for chemical analysis and a wide range of other duties. 

Photo credit: Phil Colarusso

EPA divers go through a rigorous training program and are required to maintain high levels of diving proficiency and safety protocols.  For more information on EPA’s scientific diving program go to: https://www.epa.gov/diving

Dr. Phil Colarusso is a marine biologist with US EPA Region I.  He has been working on eelgrass restoration, conservation and research for 31 years.  He and his team just recently had a paper on carbon sequestration rates in eelgrass in New England accepted for publication.

Enjoyed Phil’s sciku? Check out his previous sciku Blue Carbon and Invasive Species.

Star evolution

Increased shutter speed
proves stellar structure theory.
Star evolution.

The stellar structure model describes the internal structure of a star. Now researchers have validated this model by taking photos of a cool subdwarf star using a high-speed camera, allowing them to predict the star’s future evolution.

Rebessa-Mansergas et al (2019) used HiPERCAM, a camera mounted on the Gran Telescopio Canarias on the island of La Palma. The camera is able to take a photo in five different colours simultaneously every millisecond (compared to every few minutes), allowing the researchers to get precise measurements of the star’s mass and radius – both validating the stellar structure model for the first time and allowing the researchers to forecast the star’s evolution.

Original research: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0746-7

False positives

Again we find the

results not replicable.

False positives teem!

 

One of the core principles of research is that it should be reproducible, namely that someone else repeating your methods should get the same result as you. But there’s little resources available to reproduce work so it’s often hard to know just how reproducible a result is.

The results of a study by Camerer et al (2018) suggest that reproducibility (at least in certain fields) might be lower than expected. The researchers replicated 21 experiments published in the social sciences in the journals Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. They found that only 62% of their replications showed evidence consistent with the original studies. Interestingly, they also found evidence to suggest that the research community could predict which studies would replicate and which wouldn’t.

Original research: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z

Journal ranking

Journal ranking means

little in terms of methods.

Higher might be worse.

 

Academics aim to submit their research for publication in the most prestigious journals as this brings career advantages including during job and grant applications. This is due to the concept that only the best research, and therefore academics, will be accepted for publication by these journals.

Yet increasingly research is showing that these high ranked journals may not actually be publishing the highest quality research after all.

In a fascinating review Brembs (2018) summaries findings from multiple studies investigating journal status and research quality. Together these findings suggest that the methodological quality of research doesn’t increase with journal rank. In fact, evidence suggests that the inverse may be true – as journal status increases the quality and reliability of the published work may actually decrease. These findings could have profound impacts on ways that modern publically funded science operates and the preservation of public trust in science.

Original research: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037

The climate matters

The climate matters

when measuring hormones from

faeces – be careful!

 

Measuring changes in hormones can tell us a lot about an animal’s welfare, health and reproductive condition, and non-invasive sampling (for example using faecal matter instead of blood) can limit the amount of stress caused to the animal being monitored. But faecal samples that are collected on an opportunistic basis might not be fresh or may have been exposed to the elements prior to collection. Does this matter?

Research by Yarnell & Walker (2017) suggests that temperature does indeed have an effect on the results obtained, with exposure to room temperature and high heat showing an increase in faecal glucocorticoid metabolite levels over time. This fundamental work shows the importance of considering sample collection and storage whilst designing experiments.