Tag: Biomedical engineering

Posted on

Technomancy by Debbie Lee

Fitbit in your skull,
neuroscience leap
Musk technomancy

by Debbie Lee

Neuralink is a brain implant with 1,024 5-micron-wide (very, very thin!) electrodes and includes sensors for motion, temperature and pressure. Ultimately, according to Elon Musk, the medical goal is for such implants to be able to control prosthetic limbs, alleviate memory loss, help with addiction and fix mental illnesses and vision and hearing impairments.

Musk has described it as “a Fitbit in your skull” and some of his more enthusiastic claims are that this technology could one-day record and replay memories and (due to the device’s wireless capabilities) enable telepathy – sending and receiving words, concepts and images.

All this sounds incredible and Neuralink is certainly a step up from what has currently been available to neuroscientists – the current Utah Array has 64 electrodes and installation can cause significant tissue damage on installation and removal.

Whilst Neuralink represents a huge step forward for neuroscientists, however, there are still plenty of unknowns to do with how neurons function and how this type of technology can remain in the brain for long periods of time without causing tissue damage or being damaged by the environment within the cranium and the human immune response. For all of Musk’s technomancy hype, Neuralink currently asks more questions than it provides answers to and there are still plenty of difficult barriers to overcome before any of the promised advantages are possible.

Further reading: https://www.wired.com/story/neuralink-is-impressive-tech-wrapped-in-musk-hype/

Debbie Lee (@lee_debbie):
Writing from places light and dark,
awkward data nerd,
elegant word nerd,
dreaming in colour,
clumsily balancing love, hope,
kindness with pragmatic realism.

Posted on

A body projects by Prof Tania Douglas

A body projects

to a model of others

and finds its own shape

by Tania Douglas

Reyneke et al (2018) review the state of the art in 3D reconstruction of bone from 2D images, based on deformable models. Such reconstructions are useful in a variety of clinical applications such as surgery planning and postoperative evaluation, and implant and prosthesis design.

Original research: https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2018.2876450

Prof Tania Douglas is the South African Research Chair in Biomedical Engineering & Innovation at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. You can follow her on Twitter under the handle @tania_douglas

Posted on

Snakeskin secrets

Learning from nature:

Snakeskin secrets revealing

lessons in friction.

 

The natural world has inspired engineering and design in countless ways. Now researchers are looking at snakeskins in an attempt to better understand an understudied engineering area: friction.

Abdel-Aal (2018) summarises findings from 40 species of snake to understand how the textural traits of snake skin compare to the standard features of textured industrial surfaces. This exploratory framework could subsequently lead to new, nature-inspired smart surfaces.

Original paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.008

Posted on

Knuckle cracking maths

Knuckle cracking maths:

Synovial bubbles pop

in partial collapse.

 

The debate over how knuckles cause a popping sound when cracked has lasted for decades. Now, Chandran Suja and Barakat (2018) have created three equations to mathematically model how the sound is produced. The first equation describes variations in pressure inside the joint, the second describes how pressure variations results in bubble size variations, whilst the third equation links the size variation of bubbles with the production of acoustic pressure waves.

When cracking your fingers the joints are pulled apart, the pressure goes down and bubbles appear in the synovial fluid which lubricates the joint. During knuckle cracking the pressure changes within the joint causing the size of the bubbles to fluctuate quickly resulting in the popping sound. The new model reveals that the bubbles don’t need to completely collapse in order to produce the sound, explaining why bubbles are observed following knuckle cracking.

Original research: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22664-4